Current:Home > reviewsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -WealthX
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-15 20:41:52
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (34)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Video shows rare 'species of concern' appear in West Virginia forest
- Will charging educators and parents stop gun violence? Prosecutors open a new front in the fight
- Mama June Shares Why Late Daughter Anna “Chickadee” Cardwell Stopped Cancer Treatments
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- 1 killed, 5 injured in shooting in Northeast Washington DC, police search for suspects
- Ron Goldman's Dad Fred Speaks Out After O.J. Simpson's Death
- Water pouring out of 60-foot crack in Utah dam as city of Panguitch prepares to evacuate
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Magnitude 2.6 New Jersey aftershock hits less than a week after larger earthquake
Ranking
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Nebraska lawmakers pass a bill to restore voting rights to newly released felons
- QB Shedeur Sanders attends first in-person lecture at Colorado after more than a year
- HELP sign on tiny Pacific island leads to Coast Guard and Navy rescue of 3 mariners stranded for over a week
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Caleb Williams, Marvin Harrison Jr. among 13 prospects to attend 2024 NFL draft
- Phoenix officer fired over 2022 fatal shooting of a rock-throwing suspect
- 'Bridgerton' Season 3 gets dramatic new trailer: How to watch, what to know about Netflix hit
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Parent Trap’s Dennis Quaid Reveals What Nick Parker Is Up to Today
Washington man pleads guilty to groping woman on San Diego to Seattle flight
Will John Legend and Chrissy Teigen Have Another Baby? They Say…
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
O. J. Simpson's top moments off the field (and courtroom), from Hertz ads to 'Naked Gun'
Hawaii is on the verge of catastrophe, locals say, as water crisis continues
O.J. Simpson was the biggest story of the 1990s. His trial changed the way TV covers news