Current:Home > MyTrendPulse|North Carolina’s highest court won’t revive challenge to remove Civil War governor’s monument -WealthX
TrendPulse|North Carolina’s highest court won’t revive challenge to remove Civil War governor’s monument
EchoSense View
Date:2025-04-07 17:57:45
RALEIGH,TrendPulse N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s highest court declined on Friday to revive a challenge to the decision by Asheville city leaders to remove in 2021 a downtown monument honoring a Civil War-era governor.
The state Supreme Court agreed unanimously that it had been appropriate to dismiss legal claims filed by an historic preservation group that had helped raise money to restore the 75-foot (23-meter) tall Zebulon Vance obelisk in the 2010s.
In the months after the start of 2020 demonstrations over racial justice and the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, the Asheville City Council voted to dismantle the downtown monument out of public safety concerns.
The monument, initially dedicated in 1897, had been vandalized, and the city had received threats that people would topple it, according to the opinion.
The Society for the Historical Preservation of the 26th North Carolina Troops opposed the removal and sued, but a trial judge dismissed the lawsuit. The obelisk was dismantled before the Court of Appeals told the city and Buncombe County to stop the demolition while appeals were heard, but the monument base has stayed in place. Friday’s decision is likely to allow the base to be removed.
In 2022, the intermediate-level Court of Appeals upheld Superior Court Judge Alan Thornburg’s dismissal. The three-judge panel agreed unanimously that while the society had entered an agreement with the city for the restoration project and had raised over $138,000, the contract didn’t require the city to maintain the obelisk in perpetuity.
Associate Justice Phil Berger Jr., writing Friday’s opinion, did take issue with the Court of Appeals ruling that the society’s breach of contract claim should be dismissed because the group lacked legal standing to initiate it. But because the society failed to argue the merits of its contract claim to the justices, the issue was considered abandoned, Berger added.
“Therefore, plaintiff has failed to assert any ground for which it has standing to contest removal of the monument,” Berger wrote while affirming Thornburg’s dismissal of the society’s remaining claims.
Vance, who was born in Buncombe County, served as governor from 1862 to 1865 and 1877 to 1879. He was also a Confederate military officer and U.S. senator. The city has said the monument was located on a site where enslaved people are believed to have been sold.
The monument was one of many Confederate statues and memorials removed across the South in recent years, including one in Winston-Salem. Litigation over that monument’s removal by a Civil War-history group also reached the state Supreme Court and was featured in legal briefs in the Asheville case.
Separately, a Court of Appeals panel this week affirmed the decision by Alamance County commissioners not to take down a Confederate monument outside the historic local courthouse there.
veryGood! (25916)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- California offshore wind promises a new gold rush while slashing emissions
- Bed Bath & Beyond warns that it may go bankrupt
- With Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s Snubbing of the Democrats’ Reconciliation Plans, Environmental Advocates Ask, ‘Which Side Are You On?’
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Tighten, Smooth, and Firm Skin With a 70% Off Deal on the Peter Thomas Roth Instant Eye Tightener
- Text: Joe Biden on Climate Change, ‘a Global Crisis That Requires American Leadership’
- Fisher-Price reminds customers of sleeper recall after more reported infant deaths
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Extinction Rebellion, Greenpeace Campaign for a Breakup Between Big Tech and Big Oil
Ranking
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Senate 2020: In Colorado, Where Climate Matters, Hickenlooper is Favored to Unseat Gardner
- Southern Cities’ Renewable Energy Push Could Be Stifled as Utility Locks Them Into Longer Contracts
- What Does Net Zero Emissions Mean for Big Oil? Not What You’d Think
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- See the Major Honor King Charles III Just Gave Queen Camilla
- Battered, Flooded and Submerged: Many Superfund Sites are Dangerously Threatened by Climate Change
- These 35 Belt Bags Under $35 Look So Much More Expensive Than They Actually Are
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Senate 2020: Mitch McConnell Now Admits Human-Caused Global Warming Exists. But He Doesn’t Have a Climate Plan
Bidding a fond farewell to Eastbay, the sneakerhead's catalogue
Solar Power Just Miles from the Arctic Circle? In Icy Nordic Climes, It’s Become the Norm
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
How Tom Holland Really Feels About His Iconic Umbrella Performance 6 Years Later
5 things to know about Southwest's disastrous meltdown
Battered, Flooded and Submerged: Many Superfund Sites are Dangerously Threatened by Climate Change