Current:Home > StocksFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -WealthX
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:40:35
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3948)
Related
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- This Congressman-elect swears by (and on) vintage Superman
- Defense wants Pittsburgh synagogue shooter’s long-dead father exhumed to prove paternity
- North Korea stonewalls US on status of detained soldier
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- 'Wait Wait' for Dec. 31, 2022: Happy Holidays Edition!
- Venice International Film Festival's 2023 lineup includes Woody Allen, Roman Polanski
- These Trader Joe’s cookies may contain rocks. See the products under recall
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- How to be a better movie watcher, according to film critics (plus a handy brochure!)
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- These Trader Joe’s cookies may contain rocks. See the products under recall
- Novelist Russell Banks, dead at age 82, found the mythical in marginal lives
- Author Susan Kuklin: These teens wanted to let other kids know 'they are not alone'
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Banned Books: Maia Kobabe explores gender identity in 'Gender Queer'
- Israeli parliament approves key part of judicial overhaul amid protests
- 100% coral mortality found in coral reef restoration site off Florida as ocean temperatures soar
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Cara Delevingne Reflects on Girlfriend Leah Mason's Support Amid Sobriety Journey
Far-right activist Ammon Bundy loses defamation case and faces millions of dollars in fines
Our 2023 Pop Culture Resolutions
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
All the Stars Who Were Almost Cast in Barbie
Josh Gondelman on Bullseye's End of Year Stand-Up Comedy Spectacular
Black Friday in July Tech Deals: Major Markdowns on Macbook, AirPods, Beats, AirTag, Roku, Bose, and More