Current:Home > ContactNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -WealthX
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
PredictIQ View
Date:2025-04-11 10:20:06
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Rome court convicts far-right activists for storming union offices to oppose COVID vaccine passes
- Cinnamon in recalled applesauce pouches may have had 2,000 times the proposed limit of lead
- Southwest Airlines, pilots union reach tentative labor deal
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- DNA may link Philadelphia man accused of slashing people on trail to a cold-case killing, police say
- Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is disqualified from presidency for Jan. 6 riot
- Disney+'s 'Percy Jackson' series is more half baked than half-blood: Review
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- A quarter of Methodist congregations abandon the Church as schism grows over LGBTQ issues
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- DC is buzzing about a Senate sex scandal. What it says about the way we discuss gay sex.
- What to know about Jeter Downs, who Yankees claimed on waivers from Nationals
- Jeremy Allen White Shares Sizzling Update on The Bear Season 3
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Mother of a child punished by a court for urinating in public refuses to sign probation terms
- Travis Kelce Reacts to Amazing Taylor Swift's Appearance at Chiefs vs. Patriots Game
- Southwest Airlines, pilots union reach tentative labor deal
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Some state abortion bans stir confusion, and it’s uncertain if lawmakers will clarify them
Mega Millions winning numbers for Tuesday: Jackpot rises to $57 million
'You are the father!': Maury Povich announces paternity of Denver Zoo's baby orangutan
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Feds raided Rudy Giuliani’s home and office in 2021 over Ukraine suspicions, unsealed papers show
Parents of children sickened by lead linked to tainted fruit pouches fear for kids’ future
Patrick Mahomes’ Wife Brittany Claps Back at “Rude” Comments, Proving Haters Gonna Hate, Hate, Hate