Current:Home > StocksEarn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income. -WealthX
Earn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income.
View
Date:2025-04-12 12:06:00
Single people in San Francisco who earn less than $104,400 are considered low income, according to new government guidelines that determine who qualifies for some housing aid.
That means that some people in California who are earning above six figures — a level that's viewed as high income by many Americans — may in fact struggle to afford the basics in those regions. Other California counties where a salary of about $100,000 for a single person qualifies as low income include Marin and San Mateo counties, with the latter home to Silicon Valley.
Single workers in Los Angeles County, meanwhile, are considered low income if they earn less than $70,000, according to the new guidelines issued earlier this month by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
The income guidelines are used to determine whether people may qualify for housing programs, including Section 8 vouchers that provide rent assistance to low-income families. It may be shocking that a six-figure earner in San Francisco could qualify for housing assistance, but the median home sale price in the city was $1.4 million in May 2023, according to Zillow.
Meanwhile, the official poverty line across the U.S. stands at $12,880 for a single person, which is a guideline used for other aid programs such as food stamps and the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
San Francisco is struggling with a host of issues, including businesses that are fleeing the city amid a rise in crime and homelessness, as well as an exodus of workers and residents as many tech companies switched to remote work during the pandemic. But despite those challenges, San Francisco remains home to many big businesses — and its real estate fetches a hefty price.
Since 2016, the threshold to be considered low income as a single worker has jumped by more than $35,000, according to the San Francisco Examiner.
- In:
- Los Angeles
- Real Estate
- California
- San Francisco
veryGood! (52)
prev:A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
next:Sam Taylor
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- 'Yellowstone' Season 5, Part 2: Here's when the final episode comes out and how to watch
- OCBC chief Helen Wong joins Ho Ching, Jenny Lee on Forbes' 100 most powerful women list
- Trump names Andrew Ferguson as head of Federal Trade Commission to replace Lina Khan
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- What is Sora? Account creation paused after high demand of AI video generator
- CEO shooting suspect Luigi Mangione may have suffered from spondylolisthesis. What is it?
- Australian man arrested for starting fire at Changi Airport
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- As a Major California Oil Producer Eyes Carbon Storage, Thousands of Idle Wells Await Cleanup
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Chiquis comes from Latin pop royalty. How the regional Mexican star found her own crown
- Snoop Dogg Details "Kyrptonite" Bond With Daughter Cori Following Her Stroke at 24
- Not sure what to write in your holiday card? These tips can help: Video tutorial
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Morgan Wallen sentenced after pleading guilty in Nashville chair
- This drug is the 'breakthrough of the year' — and it could mean the end of the HIV epidemic
- The Daily Money: Now, that's a lot of zeroes!
Recommendation
Bodycam footage shows high
Here's how to make the perfect oven
Morgan Wallen's Chair Throwing Case Heading to Criminal Court
US inflation likely edged up last month, though not enough to deter another Fed rate cut
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Mitt Romney’s Senate exit may create a vacuum of vocal, conservative Trump critics
Ohio Supreme Court sides with pharmacies in appeal of $650 million opioid judgment
When fire threatened a California university, the school says it knew what to do